Normalization using weighted negative second order exponential error functions (NeONORM) provides robustness against asymmetries in comparative transcriptome …

S Noth, G Brysbaert, A Benecke - Genomics, Proteomics and …, 2006 - academic.oup.com
Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics, 2006academic.oup.com
Studies on high-throughput global gene expression using microarray technology have
generated ever larger amounts of systematic transcriptome data. A major challenge in
exploiting these heterogeneous datasets is how to normalize the expression profiles by inter-
assay methods. Different non-linear and linear normalization methods have been
developed, which essentially rely on the hypothesis that the true or perceived logarithmic
fold-change distributions between two different assays are symmetric in nature. However …
Abstract
Studies on high-throughput global gene expression using microarray technology have generated ever larger amounts of systematic transcriptome data. A major challenge in exploiting these heterogeneous datasets is how to normalize the expression profiles by inter-assay methods. Different non-linear and linear normalization methods have been developed, which essentially rely on the hypothesis that the true or perceived logarithmic fold-change distributions between two different assays are symmetric in nature. However, asymmetric gene expression changes are frequently observed, leading to suboptimal normalization results and in consequence potentially to thousands of false calls. Therefore, we have specifically investigated asymmetric comparative transcriptome profiles and developed the normalization using weighted negative second order exponential error functions (NeONORM) for robust and global inter-assay normalization. NeONORM efficiently damps true gene regulatory events in order to minimize their misleading impact on the normalization process. We evaluated NeONORM’s applicability using artificial and true experimental datasets, both of which demonstrated that NeONORM could be systematically applied to inter-assay and inter-condition comparisons.
Oxford University Press